Ever
Wondered Why So Many Australian
Footballers Play Overseas?
( Go to page 2
, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 8 9 10)
Views from the government funded Australian Broadcasting Corporation:
In the
lead up the 1998 Grand Final the ABC used the 'transvestite wogball' approach
in James O'Brian's segment
'What's
on in Sport '. A typical strategy by the organisation.
Of course he never includes football (soccer) in
his programs. Then when rugby league (packielackey)
players smear human poo all over hotel walls (Feb 1999) he says "It has
nothing to do with it (packielackey
game to be played on the weekend)."
This type
of treatment by the Australian media of Australian football (soccer) is
typical. There is one rule for soccer and another for packielackey
and tiddleywinks.
Previous
comments in the ABC such as:
"Blacks
don't play cricket in South Africa because it takes three lots of co-ordination
to play cricket:
hand,
eye and foot while only two to play soccer: hand and eye. In time the
blacks will learn the
game."
ABC Radio report from a one day international NZ vs SA. ;
The
commentators all except the NZ commentator went on to agree that this was the
case.
"The
only interesting thing at the match was the gelato." ABC Radio report of a match involving
This
team is an Australian team that has a long and distinguished
record. Many of the members of
But to
digress as a fan recently said;
"My
wrath was such that I did not, in fact, give the gist of (Jon) Anderson's
nonsense.
There was a photo of Maradona and Cannigia
kissing after a goal I
presume.
He suggested that players 'attention often appears fixed on the
posterior
with a lot of patting and sometimes even hugging. '"
So as to
the accusations of paranoia, I cannot be so
because there are others who have the same empirical experience. Visit deja-news from this web page for an insight into the
attitudes of the packielackey media morons that
dominate in
This page
is about the attempt to denigrate Australian Soccer the
so-called 'wogball' game. How ignorant they are!
And to
digress:
At
the grand final this year when the South Melbourne fans celebrated with wild
jubilation after winning in the last few minutes flares were lit and the police
moved in and then, the chairs were smashed, and .....
Treat
people like animals- some often behave like animals.
As one fan
said:
"But
I however do resent being called a "Hellarse" fan, "rotten bastards"
>and
"scum of the earth" as some people on this list have referred to
>us,
to those I say ......................... UP YOURS coz WE ARE THE
>CHAMPIONS
..........."
And he abhores violence like the rest
of the body of
Was the
Premier of Victoria threatened?- No!
He
just shook his head- not a reaction of a frightened man.
And when
thousands invaded the pitch at the AFL not a trooper in sight wielding the
truncheon anywhere!
It
appears there is a rule for one lot and not another.
Not
to mention the pitch invasions at the cricket in
the Australian 1999 summer.
Why
is it that when Australia is playing cricket and the English fans or Sri Lankan
fans carry their national flags the commentators talk in glowing terms about
their national pride, but when English, Greek , Italian, Iranian, Korean,
Japanese, Swedish etc. go to the soccer they are wogs?
Or
as one football fan puts it:
Scenario
1:
You're
at a football game.
There's lots of pissed
young people about because it's played on a summer's
evening, and they've been at the pub after work, and there's also alcohol
served at the stadium.
Some
crowd-trouble erupts, and items are thrown onto the playing surface. A
thrown bottle lands near a player from the away team, and a golf-ball
hits
him on the leg.
The
game is held up for five minutes.
The
two captains are compelled to come out on the ground together and plead
for calm.
Nine
spectator are arrested by police. Ground
security and police eject a
further 66 from the ground.
The
next day, the papers are full of stories about how football should be
banned. How it's un-Australian. Why the low-scoring nature
of the game is
the root-cause of such poor behaviour of the otherwise bored
crowd. How
it's caused by all these funny woggy people
who just don't understand proper
Australian behaviour, and they never will until their game is
banned. How
mainstream Australians, watching mainstream Australian sport, provide
the
model that these football fans should adopt. Football and its fans
becomes
the subject of vitriolic attack on talk-back radio, and in the tabloid
"current affairs" TV programs. The pictures are
displayed whenever stock
footage of a football crowd is needed in subsequent programs and stories
on
football.
Scenario
2:
You're
at a one-day cricket game.......................
And there
is more...
Attacks in
the media continued with calls to stop all sponsorship of football.
As another
fan points out
"Okay,
this tosser drive time host called Steve Price went absolutely mental
on
Monday slagging off football, the supporters, the sponsors, in fact
anyone
connected to the game. He called the fans a boorish, lunatic,
hooligans
(no exceptions everyone was included), said that no sponsor
should
be involved in football, said that a South Melbourne sponsor had
been
involved in smuggling alchohol(sic) into the
ground, questioned why any
government
should fund football programs."
Who would
buy that other beer anyway- where were they during Australia's build-up to the
World Cup-
conspicuous
by their absence.
Then the
publishers of Frank Farina's book - one of the first international stars in
Australian football had
withdrawn
due to the publicity. Corporation bigotry is alive and well in Australian
boadrooms.
What
on earth has this got to do with Frank Farina?
Eventually
the book was published but not without resistance. And what a
controversial book it is too. It exposes the ex-Australian coach Eddie
Thomson. Except that he was a good guy not a bad guy.
Now
when packielackie players smeared human poo all over
walls in hotel rooms and peed on cars from the balcony in February 99, the
Murdoch packielackey press reports it as 'a PR
hiccup'.
The
packielackey television argued that the players'
careers are not over and that rehabilitation to the game is likely.
The
ABC said it was all 'good' PR.
Other comments such as that by the Sydney Morning Herald that rugby
league is ingrained in the 'Australian psyche' or should it read psycho?
Now
the recent exposure of genitalia to a stunned Irish woman at a hotel by one of
our illustrious ARL players in the build up to the ANZAC test and its muted
media response is another example (21st April 1999) of the rule for one lot and
not the other.
Imagine
had it been a football player i.e. soccer player.
What
would have been the response by the bigots in the media here?
And
the writers in the packielackey newsgroup claim that
I am paranoid!(see newsgroup archive posts at end of
article).
It
is they that are delusional.
Imagine
calling an insignificant anal explusive game like
that world class- no one hardly plays crappy packielackey!
Where
are the calls to end packielackey sponsorship?
What
would have been the reaction if the players were footballers?
Remember the editorial barrage calling for bans of the Olyroos after their caterpillar celebration of the goal
that finally sank Canada?
A rule for one lot and not the other.
It
appears the effective monopoly media has one rule for Murdoch's packielackey and another for football (so-called wogball).
To
a biased press,
What
about the baton wielding, capsicum spraying troopers at the football?
Wolves
v Spirit (Feb 98)- fans riot or was it a police riot?
Here
is a report from a fan at the game:
"As
per usual the press has blown the whole incident out of proportion.
The
police also over reacted and must accept part of the blame for what
happend..
Wollongong
invited every child at the ground onto the pitch at half time to
be part of the entertainment ie chase the wolf
competition.
At
this stage there were hundreds of kids runnning around on the pitch.
Needless
to say some big kids jumped the fence as well and then the action
turned to the section behind the northern goal where the Spirit supporters
had congregated.
The
police chased the offenders around the back of the hill and at this
stage several hundred spectators moved to the top of the hill to view
the
'action'
This
went on for about 15 minutes during which time police back up arrived
(for what I don't know).
The
players returned to the pitch and the second half started yet most of
the crowd were more intent to watch the police using batons and capsicum
spray chase a few people around a grassed enbankment.
I
doubt there being 8 arrests.A few
supporters were evicted from the ground
for offensive language. That is for telling the police what a
bunch of
idiots thay were for the way they (the police)
had reacted to the
situation.
The
morning radio suggest that soccer's image has again
been tarnished and
that 2 English backpackers were arrested, charged with offensive
behaviour
and refused bail.
As I said a total over reaction."
One
wonders if it is all orchestrated?
Sounds familiar. Read on.
Then
there was that tiddleywinks team (Victorian rules
side) that was banned from Vietnam by the Vietnamese government because they
demolished the hotel in a drunken stupor. This seems to concur with their
attitude to foreigners. Almost total silence in the
media. No uproar , just an- oh
well. QANTAS the Australian airline carrier has on numerous occasions
expressed concerns for passenger safety because of tiddleywinks
and packielackey players
behaviour.
This
is the sport that claim they are he-men. Yet
players are suspended for tripping (April 1999)! Tiddleywimps
might be more appropriate. Half tackles at best!
The effective media monopoly owns not only the
free-to-air, the pay TV, the newspapers, the magazines but also the
telecommunications network .
Is
it any wonder that they also own the dodgy leagues?
Is
it any wonder they control the gambling outlets, buy
the internet content providers in
Is
it any wonder that they attack people's origin and heritage because they follow
soccer?
Is
it any wonder they ignore their own codes of ethics?
Then
look at
Conspicuous by their absence.
Hunter Valley wine is absent.
The ABC
blacked-out news about the Atlantan
Olympic football tournament using its monopoly radio coverage to do
so.
This
situation will highly likely continue in Sydney 2000 given current their
attitudes towards
the
world's game.
Recently,
ABC television news failed to report the
news
failed to report the scores after the matches. Yet they managed to give
saturation coverage to local
packielackey league news when not even in season. This saturation
coverage when in season results in only
modest
crowd sizes, but when even limited coverage is given to football equally large
crowds attend.
Not only
that, but they were ignorant to the fact of the Korea v Japan game at
Australia's very doorstep in the region. They do not report important games in
the region such as the Asian championships, Asian Club Championships and are
totally ignorant of the President's Cup. When overseas teams from
In the game played between the Socceroos and
The series of games (March 1998) involving the Olyroos (
The
ABC's flagship program Grandstand, felt that the
arrival of
Then there was the Oceania Cup played in
As one fan
commented when trying to get information about the final:
"Does
anybody know what time the gates open??
The
total lack of info available is astounding..."
These
were our Pacific neighbours who because they play soccer were not worthy of
recognition by the monopoly press.
Teams such as the multicultural
Of
course media blackouts are easily achieved in the effective monopoly environment
which exists in
The
government's pandering to the whims of the corporate media bigots is well
known in a country where free speech is limited due to the wealthy's
ability to use torts to extract silence from dissenting voices in the
community. Politicians even use torts when the media criticice
them.! The media owners, well they own the media
but if anyone dares to say anything about them they immediately use their
wealth to suppress freedom of speech.
Now the government
funded Australian Broadcasting Corporation continues to not report Australian
soccer in its radio sports news.
The game
between
Soccer was
again blacked out.
The
complete blackout has continued with regard to information about
The
government funded Grandstand sports program again totally ignored the Socceroo game against the
It
is they that are third rate.
This
attempt to denigrate our Socceroos is typical of this organisation and the
media in general. The packielackey stations are the
worst offenders and completely blackout any information about Australian
soccer.
Mark
Viduka by himself is worth more than the entire tiddleywinks/packielackey competitions.
As
a fan reported on the Oz soccer newsgroup who saw the
game the rest of
Location
: San Jose, USA
Result : USA 0 Australia 0
Referee : Mike Siefert
Attendance : 15,074
Temperature : 49F
Mud/Pitch Ratio : 10%
USA Snickers Player of the Match : Clint Mathis
Aust Snickers Player of the Match : Mark Viduka
Line-Ups :
[USA]
#1Zach Thornton
#23Eddie Pope
#18Carlos Llamosa #12Jeff
Agoos
#13Cobi Jones#21Richie Williams#15Clint Mathis#6Eddie Lewis#9JoeMax
Moore
#20Brian McBride #10Roy Lassiter
[
#11 Damian
Mori #9Mark Viduka
#10Josip Skoko
#2Brett Emerton #7Kasey Wehrman
#8Lucas Neill #12Simon Colosimo
#4Hayden
Foxe #5Alex Tobin
#6Tony Popovic
#1Jason Petkovic
They
are totally ignorant of the fact that there are no friendlies in football.
As
the fan reports:
"Simon
Colosimo was raped by a mad tackle from Carlos Llamosa in the 90th
minute. Carlos' two legged challenge got himself all of Simon's
right leg
and knee, and a red card to go on top. Raphael Bove
came on as the Colosimo
went off on the stretcher."
That
was the friendly!
Both
the
The
blackout continued because of the anti-competitive practises of the ignorant
monopoly media. Yet they give saturation coverage to packielackey
teams that tour for months at a time due to the lack of other teams to play.
Then
rights have been bought to Socceroo games by the
Seven Network (a tiddleywinks' station) and they are
not televised. This is the height of anti-competitive practice.
While
on the subject of
He too was ignored. This ignorance extended further to Colosomo and the list goes on....
The
ignorance continued with the media blackout of the Matildas
(Australian Women's Football ( Soccer )Team who played
These
people in the
Why
wasn't the game given to SBS to broadcast it nationally when Channel Seven had
the pictures and then refused to play them to the Australian public?
This network is the monopoly holder to the Olympic
coverage together with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation whose history of
abuse of Australian soccer is equally abominable.
They
blacked-out football from
Is
it an attempt to buy the competition and close it down?
But
hey!
Soccer
has managed to survive these bigoted attacks before!
And it is the only football code of any integrity in this country.
When
Did
the crappy packielackey media report the result?
No!
They
failed to report on the match.
Does the crappy packielackey
media continue the attempt to denigrate the sport of
football?
Of course.
Soccer
holds the crowd records for all the grounds on which the Socceroos have played.
This
has been despite the crappy packielackey
media.
Northen Spirit are also
ignored in the media . No previews
about the game- yet the crowds arrives.
A crowd of 18 thousand gets no recognition from the media and no
previews. Now that's a crappy packielackey
media!
Is it because the teams
involved have followers of "ethnic" origin (who btw also pay tax)?
Northern Spirit? Look at the names of the players!
This
is how the dottering dodder of a dodge league behaves
with its complete control of the media and the telecommunications
network. And what is their interest in gambling outlets?
The ABC
has exclusive radio rights to the Olympics in
blackout
of news about football and its current practice of blacking-out of football
news, it is reasonable to
predict
that it will use its monopoly power over the Olympic radio broadcasting
rights to again stop information
about
Olympic football from reaching the Australian public. Are they are after-all the nursery for packielackey?
As a
further example, the result of the Olyroos v
from
rugby union, rugby league and Australian rules were reported (
none of which are fully national games) in
the
reach
new lows in the extremes of ignorance.
Prediction:
The upcoming games between the Olyroos v
Monday
night 23 Nov just before the game and I can't see it mentioned anywhere.
Should I be surprised at this?
In
an amazing turn-around the ABC radio news reported the result of the first
game! Almost twenty-five words.
Olyroos 0 v China 1
Olyroos 3 v
Another piece of empirical evidence.
Now on the Friday of the game with
Not
one word about the Olyroos v
Now
is this surprising?
On
the weekend before the games there is a general blackout.
Information about the Olyroos v
But then that is normal, isn't it?
Will
Fosters an Official Sponsor of the Sydney 2000 and other Australian
corporations currently exporting and importing from
Of
course!
Corporate
bigotry rules in
Will
Olyroos receive the usual media treatment?
Well, that has been documented already. A case of-
not again!
The
appalling and scandalous thing is that the IOC have
granted monopoly media rights to the organisations that actively promote these
views.
Stoke's Joke aka Channel Seven had a complete blackout of the national
league competition results. Despite over 18 000 attending the soccer to
watch Perth Glory go top of the league there wasn't even a report
of the result on the 'bigot space' i.e. Channel Seven the Olympic monopoly
holders (except in Western Australia).
Then
there are others with different views such as:
"The
only reason that channel 7 bought the rights to the NSL coverage is
so that they could show none, thereby allowing Optus to have a jump on
the
market for Australian soccer coverage. The reason for this is that the
seven network owns a very large
number of Optus shares. This whole move is
purely business oriented, because the seven network
couldn't give (two-hoots)
about Soccer
amount that they do is only a further insult to the football watching
public."
This is unlikely because by restricting access to the very
few, the public audience has been limited to a narrow geographical base. It has
been rumored that Seven will
sell its share in Optus, but then who owns the rights?
Is
it a case that Stoke's joke is to avoid competition ?
Otherwise
the rational thing to do would be to show the games on the national free-to-air.
They already own the pictures. They do not however use them. Why
not?
Fortunately
there is an ABC coverage, but since SBS have been pushed out of the commercial
sphere, the Australian public has had very limited information about the Olyroos and Socceroos.
Never before in the history of Australian
media has there been such a complete black-out of the Australian national
teams.
Now that is anti-competitive.
How
will they treat the footballers when the
Olympics arrive?
Well
now that's well documented isn't it.
Will
it be a case of a bigoted end to the millennium
in Sydney 2000?
Unfortunately
it appears so.
Or
as a fan commented
"..But
it's not only Channel 7 that's the culprit here. What about the
coverage the papers are giving us. Especially the Herald Sun.. It's
pathetic really.."
There is
an ongoing blackout of match results in Australian Broadcasting Corporation
(ABC) news bulletins from the National Football Competition. Their official
policy is that football is 'not newsworthy' presumably because it is played by
people of all origins and backgrounds.
The
National News Editor's policy is "... consideration must be given to the
newsworthiness of various news items." Interestingly full houses at the
soccer are not reported but 4 000 at the packielackey
receive saturation coverage. News of packielackey
and tiddleywinks make the news after the game but
football not till
The ABC
has also made unfounded and unproved attacks on football players, coaches and
administrators in
claimed
by the organization. No evidence was found to support the allegations by
the ABC network. This
resulted
in huge financial losses to Australian football and individual administrators,
coaches and players falsely
accused.
Losses that Soccer Australia still have not recovered
from, and which were in part responsible for the lack of a suitable build-up to
the
These
included attacks on:
*
the National Coach, Eddie Thomson at the time (now in
It was
Eddie Thomson who laid the groundwork for Australian players in their endeavour
to escape the bigoted
attitudes
of the media here to make a reasonable living in European competitions.
It was shown that he oversaw
the
contracts so that the players received fair remuneration and no evidence was
found of any pecuniary
interests
by him. A media witch hunt motivated by prejudice eventually
resulted in Eddie Thomson seeking to
apply
his trade as a coach in
Frank
Farina in his book 'My World is Round' says of Eddie Thomson,
"This
episode showed me that that the players were more than just two feet and a head
to Eddie. He tried to look after players and advise them outside of
football which, for me, is part of what made him such a special coach".
Eddie
also had many notable victories:
As
a fan commented:
"I
know the Socceroos played good football under Venables,
but they also
played good football under Eddie Thomson when he had charge of his best
side.
Everyone
seems to forget how well the roos played against NZ
in 1993 in
penalties that same year. What about the Olyroos
beating
SFS to qualify for
SFS in the WC Cup qualifier. Facts are
that when we had our overseas stars,
Thomson invariably produced the good. I'll concede he had some
limitations
with the local-based players though he also had some good results there
v
That
of course is also not to mention his excellent record with
Hardly your packielackie/tiddleywinks
account.
*
the administrators of the game were attacked without evidence, one of whom was
an original founder of the National League and head of arguably the most
successful football club in the country; Marconi. What was his
crime? His crime was attempting to promote Australian soccer and giving
players opportunity to play in the best leagues of the world.
Is
it surprising that these cowardly packielackey/tiddleywinks
attacks
reached the highest levels of parliament?
(And
in
Not to
mention the other 180 odd nationalities who follow soccer in
The ABC’s
axing of the National Football League without notice from television coverage
when football adopted
QUIT
Smoking as a sponsor while retaining coverage of rugby league with cigarette
advertising. (
supporters
have been noted as attacking followers of football as ‘wogs’ in their attempt
to stop the progress of
football
in
It has
recently acquired the rights to the national soccer league. Will they
provide a proper coverage or use this power to limit the game's exposure?
Time will tell. And it has. No coverage on free to air. See page 2
for
why it has nothing to do with the popularity of football but is merely because
of the bigots in the Australian media. The ABC now have coverageof football, but without sponsorship deals allowed.
When one
asks, why the ABC only report soccer results between
sporadically?
The reply is " Coverage is given to the national
soccer league events, but consideration must be
given
to the newsworthiness of various news items..." from the National News
Editor-Radio. This is despite
saturation
coverage of an already duplicated packielackey/tiddleywinks
coverage on another commercial network.
This is a
grandstanding of ignorance.
The TV
Duopoly's views:
The
monopoly granted to the Seven Network in
*
blackout of Olympic Football news by the monopoly;
Virtually
the entire tournament was black-out.
*
failure to cover the games involving
Football
fans around the country organized themselves to watch the advertised match
involving the Olyroos and
were
greeted with 3 minutes of action from the game. Football fans in
is a
typical ploy by the media in its attempt to frustrate football supporters in
this country.
Another
example is the packielackey station where they
advertised a game and then put some ridiculous show about the end of the world
in its place. They practice the technique of complete blackout of
information about football. Is this surprising out a company that owns packielackey and gambling in
*
blackout of other games in the tournament;
This
network also:
*
failed to report the result Grand Final of the National Football Competition
despite a record sell-out crowd in
1996;
and
* gives saturation coverage of negative aspects of the
game.
This is
because it as one of the two suppliers of television spends large sums on
Australian Rules and is
prepared
to pay to get the rights to football so as to blackout the coverage of the game
to avoid competition with
its
code.
It is this
organization that has extensive financial interests in the Docklands Stadium
that was originally
mooted
as the site for Olympic Football, then withdrawn
without notice by the government under pressure from
the
consortium. This caused a last minute need to reorganize the location of
football tournament for Sydney
2000.
It is another clear example of how the media operates in
Recently
this organization entered an agreement with Soccer
As a fan
recently commented:
"We
were promised the total package & the most
comprehensive
coverage of the NSL ever. I always liked SBS but I wouldn't
care
who showed it as long as we get coverage of the game. I am really
annoyed
we have now got virtually nothing. Channel 7 & the ABC have the
rights
now, not SBS any more, so where is NSL coverage ? short of getting
cable,
how do I get to see highlights of Perth Glory v
Spirit
v Syd Olympic ? And I am not talking about 15 second
items in the
7pm
news.
So someone
is not doing their job, or we have been lied to."
Or as another fan observed:
"The
only down side was that ABC (and TV in general) continue to
stuff
up the audio. Why is it they can make a crappy
about 2,000 sound like Wembley and yet muffle 17,000 crowds at the
soccer so
that
you'd swear there were only a dozen people. That's two weekends in a
row,
both involving the Spirit."
It is
becoming apparent that the rights to Australian soccer have been bought to stop
coverage and to limit its exposure to the public. It is these same
organisations that hold the exclusive rights to the olympic coverage. All indications are that
there is to be another blackout of football news at the next olympics in Sydney 2000.
This may be last gasp attempt to stop football in the old millennium to which
these types of media organisation belong.
We have
the World Cup in Asia in the new millennium. Hopefully technology in the
new millennium will make football information available to all Australians and
reduce the monopoly control and anti-competitive practices of the Australian
media.
Of course
the Seven Network who own the Olympic rights to 2000
games have used their ownership to not show Australian soccer games on its
free-to-air network.
The
buy-out of Australian soccer rights to the free-to-air networks has been used
to avoid competition by not showing games on free-to-air television. The ABC
coverage though quite good does not allow commercial sponsorship and so
football cannot compete on an equal footing as the right to do so has been
bought by Seven and not used. Why would they do
that? To avoid competition?
Further,
the government in Sydney then saw fit to ignore the football fraternity in its
organization and appointed
packielackey administrators to ensure that football at the
Olympics is not properly promoted! These appointees
have no knowledge nor desire to promote football. In fact
the board is full of packielackeys!
There organisational skills -non-existent and attitude to people of other
nations (wogball followers) is well known. Now they come from an
organisation whose vested interest is to stop football.
The same
thing then happened in Brisbane, another location of the football tournament.
The administrator is from The packielackey
code and whose interest is in not promoting football at all. In fact , they have moved the
stadium
away from the football stadium to the packielackey
stadium. In a peculiar burst of realisation there has been a move to the
IOC but the essentials of the argument still hold. All the benefit of the
stadium upgrade will
go to
the other codes, and football will miss out on the use of the stadium after the
Olympics. This leaves football without a stadium of
world class quality anywhere in
a
result of the Olympics.
The
stadium situation for soccer is so bad in Australia that Soccer Australia's
newest club Northern Spirit cannot get decent facilities and are obstructed
from improving the crowd comfort which have been around the 16 thousand
mark. The playing pitch is treacherous with a cricket pitch in the middle.
On all accounts it is also a treacherous wicket. This situation will also
exist after the Olympics.
Attempts
were also made to stop the football finals from being played in the main
Olympic Stadium. It was
argued
they would interfere with the closing ceremony-but the real reason was to stop
access of football. There
was
even discussion of playing packielackey before the
Olympics to open the stadium in the ultimate insult to the
Olympic
movement. The packielackey code has a history
of attacking players of football as 'wogs'- hardly the
Olympic
ideal.
Now that
the members of the Sydney Olympic Games Organising Committee in charge of the
football
tournament are from the packielackey stable and have
free access to FIFA marketing
expertise
which has been denied to Australian soccer, it is now intended to
open the Olympic
Stadium
not with football but with rugby league.
The
expertise in marketing brought by FIFA is still lost to soccer. The stadiums
are still lost to soccer. Footballers will again be
forced to played on sub-standard pitches while all the benefits of these
stadiums are to go to other codes and sports. The use of the Olympic
Stadium by football will be limited to when other codes are not using it.
Packielackey for instance requires only thick lush
grass and a soft surface and it is unlikely that an even bounce and level
surface will remain a feature of the stadium. This is the experience from
the other 'multi-pupose'
grounds where the ground surfaces resemble crater fields with multiple
markings rather than football fields.
The
defilement of the Sydney 2000 stadium is to be complete, with the packielackey (rugby league) opening and its attitude to
international sports people is well known- wogs playing wogball (footballers
playing football). But then one only needs to look at the composition of
the board to realise their attitude.
In
an amazing turn-around it now appears that soccer will actually open the
stadium with a FIFA approved World XI v Socceroos
match. It appears that at least somewhere the Olympic spirit lives and
fair play seems to have triumphed.
How
wrong it is to even contemplate such a thing!
The
opening game will be packielackey and no wonder given
the members of the board. A full house is expected for the double-header
of packielackey at discount prices. Then the
used multi-lined, divoted surface of a stadium gets a
second-hand opening with FIFA World XI v Socceroos at ticket prices in excess
of $A140 played on the defiled turf! Compare that to the under $10
tickets for the packielackey opening with most
tickets at $A5. An
organised and premeditated attempt to further down-grade football by the
packielackey administrators- you can bet on it!
The
Prime Minister of Australia in typical weak-kneed fashioned oversaw the end of
the last semblance of any olympic spirit for the
millennium ending Sydney 2000 games as the packielackey
teams emerged on March 7, 1999 into the Stadium Australia. The packielackey defilement of the Sydney 2000 Olympics is now
complete with almost a full house in attendance. With continuous use of
the Stadium by packielackey up to the games the
result is an old stadium for an old century with old multi-marked lines, an old
soddy surface and an old
bigoted board. The media shouts world record crowd! Bull, there were two
games on not one!
The
board of packielackey cronies
want desperately not to play football at the ground during the
Olympics. Why is that mate?
Prediction:
a total media blackout of the second-hand opening event- football in Sydney by
the packielackey media. How will the players be
treated? A predictable "Oh no, here are all those wogs."
The
result is a second-hand stadium for the Olympic Opening Ceremony by the group
that has used
the 'wogball' attack to justify its own sport. Not only that; this
sport has only just started to test for
drug use of its players. And guess what? Rife
throughout the game. Now this is a great
advertisement for the Olympic movement and Olympic spirit here in Sydney.
And
in all this, there is not one Australian soccer stadium that can be used in
local or international competitions
from the considerable building projects without hard cricket pitches in the
middle of playing
surfaces or without the heavily sodded, long grass ,
soft surfaces typical of rugby league grounds that increase the risk of leg injuries to the
mobile players of football in this country.
edmundoe@my-dejanews.com